{"id":28393,"date":"2026-10-12T09:34:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T06:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/?p=28393"},"modified":"2026-10-12T12:55:31","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T09:55:31","slug":"announcement-of-evaluation-results-for-concept-0326-call-of-the-proof-of-concept-for-technology-know-how-applications-programme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/announcement-of-evaluation-results-for-concept-0326-call-of-the-proof-of-concept-for-technology-know-how-applications-programme\/","title":{"rendered":"Announcement of Evaluation Results for CONCEPT\/0326 Call of the \u201cProof of Concept for Technology \/ Know-how Applications\u201d Programme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Research and Innovation Foundation (RIF) announces the evaluation results of proposals submitted under the Call for Proposals of the \u201cProof of Concept for Technology \/ Know-how Applications\u201d CONCEPT\/0326 Programme, which is part of the RESTART 2016-2020 Programmes for Research, Technological Development and Innovation. The evaluation procedure was completed within three (3) months following the Call deadline.<\/p>\n<p>The Call was announced on 24 March 2026, with a submission deadline of 26 June 2026. The evaluation results have been announced to the Beneficiaries and are available <a href=\"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/wp-content\/uploads\/CONCEPT-0326-Results-for-website.pdf\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Proposals were evaluated through remote scientific evaluation by two (2) Independent Evaluators, in accordance with the provisions of the Call.<\/p>\n<p>For the selection of eligible proposals for funding, the Call\u2019s selection criteria were applied.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Research and Innovation Foundation (RIF) announces the evaluation results of proposals submitted under the Call for Proposals of the \u201cProof of Concept for Technology \/ Know-how Applications\u201d CONCEPT\/0326 Programme, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcements"],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-10-20 02:31:07","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28393"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28396,"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28393\/revisions\/28396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.research.org.cy\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}